Blog <-

Keeping Pace with Biomedical Breakthroughs: The Daily Influx of New Research Insights

Mehdi Jamei

10.26.2023

In biomedical research, staying up to date is more crucial than ever. Every day, between 3000 and 5000 new papers are added to databases like PubMed, flooding the field with fresh findings and observations. Researchers seeking to conduct a thorough literature review or answer specific questions must examine this massive influx of information to ensure their work is informed by the latest and most accurate data. It is imperative for researchers and clinicians to engage with the most recent literature to maintain relevance and accuracy in their own investigations.

AI, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), could theoretically help researchers sift through the massive amount of new information. But there's a problem: LLMs often have old information because retraining them with new data is costly and not often done. For example, the knowledge cutoff for OpenAI's GPT is September 2021 [ref], and the knowledge cutoff for Google’s PaLM 2 (the foundation model behind Med-PaLM 2) is "mid-2021" [ref]. This means that in fast-moving areas like biomedicine, the information LLMs have might not be the most recent.

System offers a unique solution to this need. Our large-scale extraction pipeline runs daily to capture findings from newly published studies, structure them in System's massive graph, and can make them available to an LLM for synthesis based on the user's query. We have a robust series of monitoring and alerting systems in place to make sure that the data is always fresh and our users have the latest information for their work.

To illustrate this problem and our solution, here are two examples.

Example 1: Early Use of Cryoprecipitate With Major Hemorrhage Protocol (MHP) Activation

A multi-centered randomized controlled trial  was conducted in the US and UK to compare standard of care (SOC) massive transfusion protocol to SOC massive transfusion protocol plus early use of cryoprecipitate (within 90 minutes of emergency department arrival). The phase 3 clinical trial was completed in Nov 2021, and the peer-reviewed paper of the findings, titled Early and Empirical High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury, was published in JAMA in Oct 2023.

Let's see what you can find about this intervention on System Pro and compare it with OpenAI's GPT-4.

System

Search query: High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury

⚠️ Overview

High-dose cryoprecipitate treatment for hemorrhage after traumatic injury is a potential intervention to improve patient outcomes. One study compared cryoprecipitate treatment to standard care in patients with trauma and bleeding who required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol. The study found that cryoprecipitate treatment was not associated with a change in all-cause 28-day mortality [1, 2]. Another study evaluated the effectiveness of standard care, which included a local major hemorrhage protocol, and also found no change in all-cause mortality at 28 days [2]. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of high-dose cryoprecipitate in the management of hemorrhage after traumatic injury.

⚠️ Clinical Trials

Clinical trials comparing high-dose cryoprecipitate treatment to standard care in patients with trauma and bleeding who required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol found no change in all-cause mortality at 28 days [1, 2].

GPT-4

Prompt: tell me about High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury

As of my last update in September 2021, high-dose cryoprecipitate therapy has been explored as a treatment option to manage hemorrhage after traumatic injury. Cryoprecipitate is a component of blood plasma rich in clotting factors, such as fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and fibronectin, which are essential for blood clot formation. After a traumatic injury, a patient may experience significant blood loss, leading to a condition called coagulopathy, where the blood’s ability to form clots is impaired.

In the context of trauma and hemorrhage:

  1. High-Dose Cryoprecipitate: High-dose cryoprecipitate administration aims to rapidly replenish the lost clotting factors, particularly fibrinogen, to improve the blood’s clotting ability and control hemorrhage.
  2. Application in Trauma: In traumatic injuries accompanied by significant hemorrhage, managing coagulopathy is crucial. High-dose cryoprecipitate can be administered promptly to stabilize the patient’s condition and prevent excessive blood loss.
  3. Benefits: High-dose cryoprecipitate allows for a concentrated dose of clotting factors to be delivered quickly, potentially stabilizing the patient sooner and improving outcomes.
  4. Research and Evidence: Studies have been conducted to assess the effectiveness, safety, and optimal dosing of high-dose cryoprecipitate in trauma patients. Results may vary, and continuous research helps in refining the guidelines for its use.
  5. Guidelines and Protocols: Medical protocols and guidelines would be established, taking into consideration the patient's condition, the extent of injury, and blood loss, to determine the appropriateness and dosage of cryoprecipitate administration.

Remember to consult current literature or medical professionals for the most accurate and updated information, as practices and guidelines evolve based on ongoing research and clinical experience. The exact protocols, efficacy, and safety of high-dose cryoprecipitate for hemorrhage after traumatic injury might have been updated beyond my last training data in September 2021.

In this example, System, using the extracted findings from the published paper of the trial (reference No.1) correctly tells you that the intervention in question did not have the expected outcome — but GPT-4, although pointing out the gap in its knowledge, implies that high-dose cryoprecipitate therapy could be an effective treatment option. 

Example 2: Efficacy and Safety of Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin-Mediated Amyloid Polyneuropathy

A global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eplontersen after administration for 65 weeks to patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloid polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN), as compared to the NEURO-TTR trial. The study started in December 2019 and was concluded in April 2023. The subsequent paper outlining the results, titled Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Polyneuropathy was published in September 2023 in JAMA. Let's compare System Pro's knowledge vs GPT-4 about Eplontersen.

System 

Search: Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

 ⚠️ Overview

Eplontersen, a treatment for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis, has been shown to have positive effects in clinical trials. The treatment group experienced decreases in serum transthyretin concentration [1], modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7) composite score [2] and Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL-DN) total score [3]

⚠️ Effectiveness

Eplontersen treatment group is associated with decreases in serum transthyretin concentration.[1]

GPT-4 

Prompt: tell me about Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, Eplontersen (formerly known as TTR-LRx) is an investigational RNA-targeted therapeutic. It's an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) developed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals to treat hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (hATTR). This rare genetic disorder is caused by mutations in the TTR gene, leading to the accumulation of abnormal transthyretin (TTR) protein aggregates, known as amyloid deposits, in various organs and tissues, such as nerves and heart, which can result in neuropathy and cardiomyopathy.

Eplontersen is designed to bind to the messenger RNA (mRNA) of the TTR gene, reducing the production of the TTR protein, and thereby potentially preventing or slowing the progression of the disease. 

Clinical trials would be ongoing to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of eplontersen in participants with hATTR. I recommend checking the latest updates from clinical trial databases, medical journals, or the pharmaceutical company's official website to get the most accurate and up-to-date information. Remember that it's always essential to consult healthcare professionals for medical advice and information regarding treatment options.

GPT-4 knows that a trial is ongoing about this topic, but has no knowledge of the outcome. System Pro's synthesis, on the other hand, outlines the details of the finding from the published paper and gives you the exact effect size of the intervention in citation:

(Citation 1) Eplontersen treatment group [vs historical placebo group] is associated with a 70.5 unit decrease in the mean of percentage reduction in serum transthyretin concentration.

Conclusion

AI holds significant promise for keeping researchers and clinicians up to date with the latest research, but its efficacy hinges on the freshness of the knowledge it operates on. The System Graph augments the functionality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by ensuring they are provided with the most current and relevant information. This approach mitigates the issues traditionally associated with outdated knowledge bases, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the insights derived from these models.

The freshness of knowledge is not only critical in maintaining relevance but also important in reducing hallucination or confabulation in AI systems. Research has shown that LLMs tend to exhibit increased instances of erroneous or fabricated outputs in domains where they have inadequate training data. In their survey of hallucination in Large Language Models, Zhang et al point out that "When asked to answer questions or complete tasks, LLMs often exhibit hallucinations if they lack pertinent knowledge or have internalized false knowledge from the training corpora." [ref]. Therefore, not only are the answers provided by LLMs like ChatGPT to biomedical questions with recent breakthroughs often irrelevant, but also they are more likely to be dangerously misleading or inaccurate.

By prioritizing up-to-date knowledge infusion, System's proprietary methodology addresses these computational inaccuracies, creating a more robust, accurate, reliable, and ultimately useful AI-driven research assistant. Read more about our methodology here.

Keeping Pace with Biomedical Breakthroughs: The Daily Influx of New Research Insights

Mehdi Jamei

October 26, 2023

In biomedical research, staying up to date is more crucial than ever. Every day, between 3000 and 5000 new papers are added to databases like PubMed, flooding the field with fresh findings and observations. Researchers seeking to conduct a thorough literature review or answer specific questions must examine this massive influx of information to ensure their work is informed by the latest and most accurate data. It is imperative for researchers and clinicians to engage with the most recent literature to maintain relevance and accuracy in their own investigations.

AI, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), could theoretically help researchers sift through the massive amount of new information. But there's a problem: LLMs often have old information because retraining them with new data is costly and not often done. For example, the knowledge cutoff for OpenAI's GPT is September 2021 [ref], and the knowledge cutoff for Google’s PaLM 2 (the foundation model behind Med-PaLM 2) is "mid-2021" [ref]. This means that in fast-moving areas like biomedicine, the information LLMs have might not be the most recent.

System offers a unique solution to this need. Our large-scale extraction pipeline runs daily to capture findings from newly published studies, structure them in System's massive graph, and can make them available to an LLM for synthesis based on the user's query. We have a robust series of monitoring and alerting systems in place to make sure that the data is always fresh and our users have the latest information for their work.

To illustrate this problem and our solution, here are two examples.

Example 1: Early Use of Cryoprecipitate With Major Hemorrhage Protocol (MHP) Activation

A multi-centered randomized controlled trial  was conducted in the US and UK to compare standard of care (SOC) massive transfusion protocol to SOC massive transfusion protocol plus early use of cryoprecipitate (within 90 minutes of emergency department arrival). The phase 3 clinical trial was completed in Nov 2021, and the peer-reviewed paper of the findings, titled Early and Empirical High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury, was published in JAMA in Oct 2023.

Let's see what you can find about this intervention on System Pro and compare it with OpenAI's GPT-4.

System

Search query: High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury

⚠️ Overview

High-dose cryoprecipitate treatment for hemorrhage after traumatic injury is a potential intervention to improve patient outcomes. One study compared cryoprecipitate treatment to standard care in patients with trauma and bleeding who required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol. The study found that cryoprecipitate treatment was not associated with a change in all-cause 28-day mortality [1, 2]. Another study evaluated the effectiveness of standard care, which included a local major hemorrhage protocol, and also found no change in all-cause mortality at 28 days [2]. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of high-dose cryoprecipitate in the management of hemorrhage after traumatic injury.

⚠️ Clinical Trials

Clinical trials comparing high-dose cryoprecipitate treatment to standard care in patients with trauma and bleeding who required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol found no change in all-cause mortality at 28 days [1, 2].

GPT-4

Prompt: tell me about High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury

As of my last update in September 2021, high-dose cryoprecipitate therapy has been explored as a treatment option to manage hemorrhage after traumatic injury. Cryoprecipitate is a component of blood plasma rich in clotting factors, such as fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and fibronectin, which are essential for blood clot formation. After a traumatic injury, a patient may experience significant blood loss, leading to a condition called coagulopathy, where the blood’s ability to form clots is impaired.

In the context of trauma and hemorrhage:

  1. High-Dose Cryoprecipitate: High-dose cryoprecipitate administration aims to rapidly replenish the lost clotting factors, particularly fibrinogen, to improve the blood’s clotting ability and control hemorrhage.
  2. Application in Trauma: In traumatic injuries accompanied by significant hemorrhage, managing coagulopathy is crucial. High-dose cryoprecipitate can be administered promptly to stabilize the patient’s condition and prevent excessive blood loss.
  3. Benefits: High-dose cryoprecipitate allows for a concentrated dose of clotting factors to be delivered quickly, potentially stabilizing the patient sooner and improving outcomes.
  4. Research and Evidence: Studies have been conducted to assess the effectiveness, safety, and optimal dosing of high-dose cryoprecipitate in trauma patients. Results may vary, and continuous research helps in refining the guidelines for its use.
  5. Guidelines and Protocols: Medical protocols and guidelines would be established, taking into consideration the patient's condition, the extent of injury, and blood loss, to determine the appropriateness and dosage of cryoprecipitate administration.

Remember to consult current literature or medical professionals for the most accurate and updated information, as practices and guidelines evolve based on ongoing research and clinical experience. The exact protocols, efficacy, and safety of high-dose cryoprecipitate for hemorrhage after traumatic injury might have been updated beyond my last training data in September 2021.

In this example, System, using the extracted findings from the published paper of the trial (reference No.1) correctly tells you that the intervention in question did not have the expected outcome — but GPT-4, although pointing out the gap in its knowledge, implies that high-dose cryoprecipitate therapy could be an effective treatment option. 

Example 2: Efficacy and Safety of Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin-Mediated Amyloid Polyneuropathy

A global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eplontersen after administration for 65 weeks to patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloid polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN), as compared to the NEURO-TTR trial. The study started in December 2019 and was concluded in April 2023. The subsequent paper outlining the results, titled Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Polyneuropathy was published in September 2023 in JAMA. Let's compare System Pro's knowledge vs GPT-4 about Eplontersen.

System 

Search: Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

 ⚠️ Overview

Eplontersen, a treatment for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis, has been shown to have positive effects in clinical trials. The treatment group experienced decreases in serum transthyretin concentration [1], modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7) composite score [2] and Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL-DN) total score [3]

⚠️ Effectiveness

Eplontersen treatment group is associated with decreases in serum transthyretin concentration.[1]

GPT-4 

Prompt: tell me about Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, Eplontersen (formerly known as TTR-LRx) is an investigational RNA-targeted therapeutic. It's an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) developed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals to treat hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (hATTR). This rare genetic disorder is caused by mutations in the TTR gene, leading to the accumulation of abnormal transthyretin (TTR) protein aggregates, known as amyloid deposits, in various organs and tissues, such as nerves and heart, which can result in neuropathy and cardiomyopathy.

Eplontersen is designed to bind to the messenger RNA (mRNA) of the TTR gene, reducing the production of the TTR protein, and thereby potentially preventing or slowing the progression of the disease. 

Clinical trials would be ongoing to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of eplontersen in participants with hATTR. I recommend checking the latest updates from clinical trial databases, medical journals, or the pharmaceutical company's official website to get the most accurate and up-to-date information. Remember that it's always essential to consult healthcare professionals for medical advice and information regarding treatment options.

GPT-4 knows that a trial is ongoing about this topic, but has no knowledge of the outcome. System Pro's synthesis, on the other hand, outlines the details of the finding from the published paper and gives you the exact effect size of the intervention in citation:

(Citation 1) Eplontersen treatment group [vs historical placebo group] is associated with a 70.5 unit decrease in the mean of percentage reduction in serum transthyretin concentration.

Conclusion

AI holds significant promise for keeping researchers and clinicians up to date with the latest research, but its efficacy hinges on the freshness of the knowledge it operates on. The System Graph augments the functionality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by ensuring they are provided with the most current and relevant information. This approach mitigates the issues traditionally associated with outdated knowledge bases, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the insights derived from these models.

The freshness of knowledge is not only critical in maintaining relevance but also important in reducing hallucination or confabulation in AI systems. Research has shown that LLMs tend to exhibit increased instances of erroneous or fabricated outputs in domains where they have inadequate training data. In their survey of hallucination in Large Language Models, Zhang et al point out that "When asked to answer questions or complete tasks, LLMs often exhibit hallucinations if they lack pertinent knowledge or have internalized false knowledge from the training corpora." [ref]. Therefore, not only are the answers provided by LLMs like ChatGPT to biomedical questions with recent breakthroughs often irrelevant, but also they are more likely to be dangerously misleading or inaccurate.

By prioritizing up-to-date knowledge infusion, System's proprietary methodology addresses these computational inaccuracies, creating a more robust, accurate, reliable, and ultimately useful AI-driven research assistant. Read more about our methodology here.

Filed Under:

Tech

Tech